editing

Editing Sale!

I’ve got to get Issue Two of Lakeside Circus out, which means paying our contributors. We’re not yet fully funded through our subscriptions, so I’m running a brief sale on my editing services.

50% off any single project up to 40,000 words and 25% off any project over 40,000 words

This is a first-come, first-serve, sale. To take advantage of it, you must book and pay the deposit on your project. (Projects under $100 are payable in advance; all others require a 50% payment before the project begins, with the remainder due on a schedule agreed to by both parties.)

You can learn more about my services and usual rates here, which includes a contact form. Want to know what others think of my work? Today’s praise from a client:

I have enjoyed working with Carrie Cuinn, tremendously.  Her work ethic, professionalism and editing skill are second to none.  When presented with extremely tight deadlines, she came through and provided us with exactly what we were looking for.  I look forward to working with her again in the future on many different projects! – Howard S., Animal Media Group

 #SFWAPro

Proofing and Edit Marks: A Primer

As technology advances, we often lose the manual skills that tech is meant to replace. Even knowledge fades away as new techniques are developed. How many of us have the Dewey Decimal system memorized anymore? Know how to rebuild a carburetor? How about canning your own jellies, sewing a quilt by hand, or raising chickens*? If we’re lucky it becomes trendy to “revive” these skills (in the same way that some of us collect “artifacts” like Depression-era glassware and vinyl records**), but many less popular bits of information are lost.

The problem is, we often discover that we still needed what we thought we’d outgrown — usually at the worst times. Because of this, it becomes important to save the bits of history and knowledge that are part of lost skills, even when we’re told some new advancement means we don’t need to know how to do that thing anymore. Otherwise, the information is lost, as far as the general population is concerned.

One of the skills we’re not taught anymore is how to read and use editing marks. I’m referring to the little symbols editors use to mark-up a hardcopy document for editing. Before Track Changes became the editing go-to method, we used to transform a clean, white, sheet of paper into a tangle of red ink reminiscent of a football playbook, using these symbols.

In fact, it’s often faster to edit on paper this way than it is to use the track changes feature in a Word document. Depending on what the recommended edits are, it’s sometimes easier to clearly see the suggestions. Since Adobe lets you markup a PDF in the same way, making it possible to proof digital documents already in their print layout, even if you’ll never receive old-school paper edits again, there’s still a reason for you to know these symbols.

Better: knowing how to use and read these marks will let you keep working even when your internet is down, your laptop goes missing, your desktop computer suffers the blue screen of death, or you suddenly realize your deadline means that you have to finish those edits in the 45 minutes before your next panel while your editor sits next to you marking up pages a moment before she hands them to you to read.

Editing marks are a little different from proof marks, because copy editing is about looking for errors in spelling, grammar, or semantics. Proofing a document should keep an eye out for those errors, but is largely concerned with whether the document is ready to go to print. Is it clean, formatted well, and set properly on the page? Did any new errors get introduced after the final editing pass? Do slight changes need to be made from the organic placement on the page to fit traditional publishing rules (like whether a single word is left over on the next page, or if a sentence breaks in a way that gives it an unintended meaning)?

Editing marks will suggest changes: substituting, deleting, or transposing words; changing or adding punctuation; asking for clarification; requesting a return to a previous version.

The following list of marks is taken from figure 2.6 of the 16th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style:

CMOSproofmarks

Click for the larger version.

Note that it includes the same marks as you’d find in an edit pass, but also has symbols for typesetting changes. Other editing marks include:

en En dash.
em Em (long) dash.
sp Spell it out.
awk. Awkward phrasing.
dang. mod. Dangling modifier.
mis. mod. Misplaced modifier.
>frag. Sentence fragment.
wc Questionable word choice.
ref. Faulty or ambiguous reference.
r-o Run-on sentence.
c-o Comma splice.
S-V agr Subject-verb agreement.

There was a time when elementary school students all across the nation were taught how to proof their own work in this way. I wasn’t exposed to them until high school, but my English Composition teacher made sure we knew. At that time, though, it was clear we were among the last to learn this skill as part of a public school curriculum. Given that we’ve dropped these marks from our standard education here in the US in the last few decades, these proof marks might seem to be an invention of early 20th century grammar school teacher. Brought in to codify white American middle-class English in the same way as Strunk’s Elements of Style

In fact, they were developed around the same time as the printing press. From A Census of Print Runs for Fifteenth-Century Books***:

According to the contract of 22 May 1499, Beroaldus provided the paper, the copy, proofreading and correction, and promised to promote the edition during his lectures on the text at Bologna University. This document was cited but not transcribed in Albano Sorbelli, Storia, della stampain Bologna (Bologna: Zanichelli, 1929), 61, citing the original in the “Archivio notarile di Bologna, atti del notaio Agostino Landi, 22 May 1499.”

Early editions are full of these marks — along with the frequent request by printers and proofreaders for an author to strike a particular word from their vocabulary… ever again.

See? Some things never change. Forgetting the use and meaning of these marks means forgetting 500 years of editing shorthand which served us from the dawn of the Information Age. I can’t be the one to let that go. Can you?

Any questions? Feel free to leave a comment, and I’ll answer whatever I can.

* Yes, I can do those things.

** This is me, too. My car even has a cassette deck. But I don’t have a hipster beard. I had to draw the line somewhere.

*** by Eric Marshall White, Curator of Special Collections, Bridwell Library, Southern Methodist University, 2012.

#SFWAPro

Editing isn’t writing, or, how being an editor is like waiting for your chance to take a bow.

I’ve just finished putting together the contents of the first issue of Lakeside Circus. I am immensely proud of this publication, which represents a lifelong goal of mine. I am thrilled by the names we’ve lined up, and even more thrilled at the stories and poems they submitted. There’s still work to be done – and a lot of it, over the next two weeks – but for a moment I can sit back, admire the Table of Contents, and be content.

But editing is not about me.

Ultimately, when this issue is published, the people who’ll be (rightfully) getting the accolades will be the authors. That’s how it should be. Being “the editor” means being the person who puts together the anthology, selects the work, does the editing, arranges for a cover (whether by hiring the artist and working on the design, or being part of the team that approves the final version). When you’re a small press editor, you’re also sometimes the publisher, and that can mean doing the accounting, advertising, publicity, getting the project made into an ebook or designing the print version, overseeing contracts, doing the mailing… For me, that’s always been true. I do it all.

Editing is much less about being the star of the show and much more like being the stage manager. It’s office work and costuming and setting the lighting cues so that when your performers walk out into the public eye, they look and sound their best. You arrange the performances in the right order so that one plays into the next, and none take away from what came before or comes after. You read the anxious emails from authors who didn’t get something they should have, and you make sure they get it, or who aren’t sure this is their best work (so you assure them you love it, because if you didn’t, you wouldn’t have bought it). You make sure the theater is booked for the right day, the tickets are printed, you have enough volunteers to seat the patrons, and your curtain will rise on time.

And at the end, when the actors take their bow, you sometimes get a nod, a wave. You might even get moment to step out into the bright lights and blushingly accept some of the praise. Maybe.

Your authors will thank you for the chance to be in your production, and that’s right. You did give them an opportunity to shine. But they’re the ones who wrote the stories, who will get the best or harshest reviews, who’ll be lauded if they succeeded or singled out if they failed. The pressure on them isn’t like what you face as an editor. If a piece in your anthology falls flat, it’s the author who’ll be criticized, even though it was your job to keep that from happening.

A few weeks ago, Ellen Datlow posted about how terribly unprofessional it is to include your own work in something you’ve edited. Most people agreed. A few stood up and said, “Why would I edit an anthology if I wasn’t going to use it as a vehicle for my own writing?”

That sound you might have heard was me banging my head against my desk.

I edit because I want to see a certain kind of publication in the world. Editing gives me the power to create the book or magazine that’s missing from the library shelf. I write when I want the focus to be on me. They’re two different things. If you aren’t confident enough of your skill as a writer that you can’t see yourself selling that story to someone else, putting it in anthology you’re editing won’t make your writing any better or do that much to help your career. Most of us will see you used the work of others to promote your own. You bring down the value of their work by casting aspersions on the whole production. Like a director who also stars in the show… we’ll always wonder if it could have been better had you stayed behind the scenes instead of insisting on the spotlight.

I love getting to work as an editor. I am a writer. Those two things are different, too. Knowing that, I can pour all of my free time into editing (and I do) but still feel the ache and need to write. I can write and not miss editing, until I go looking for a book that doesn’t exist. Then it’s time to put out a casting call, arrange for a theater, hire a crew, and start all over again.

Be aware of the hard work and time it takes to edit an anthology, or oversee a magazine. I’ll appreciate that you noticed, in the same way that I’d expect to be recognized for finishing a big project at my dayjob. (In fact, it’s exactly the same as that.) But be impressed by the authors who made that time and effort worthwhile. I know that I am.

And when I share the next piece of my own writing that’s been published, you can shine the spotlight on me then. That’ll be my time to shine.

Quick Updates (Writing, editing, job hunt, SFWA, and more)

The bullet points:

  • WordPress decided to feature my recent post “11 Exhausted SF Tropes You Should Avoid” as their Fresh Pressed blog today. Hello, new readers!
  • I still have spots open in my Short Fiction Workshop, which begins August 1. You can read more about it here and here. Only $50 for a 4 week online class in micro and flash fiction, sign up today!
  • I’m also still taking editing clients, though I’m nearly booked up. See my editing services page for rates and notes.
  • The last few days have been stressful and sad; I’ve had trouble sleeping, haven’t been eating. Managed to convince myself to get something today–which ended up being a giant cheeseburger and fries. Okay, not healthy, but the most delicious thing I’ve eaten since Friday. I’ve had a lot of success losing weight and getting fitter recently by remembering to balance healthy food with tasty food. I had to buy a suit this week, for job interviews, and was pleasantly surprised to find I’d gone down a pants size since Readercon. So, yes, carrots, hummus,  fruit, prawns, steamed vegetables… and white rice, lumpia*, corned beef, bacon, and cheeseburgers. Mmm.
  • Speaking of interviews: I had two phone interviews last week, an in-person interview yesterday, one scheduled for tomorrow, and another one on Friday. All summer, I’ve sent out resumes and heard nothing. Now that Fall is looming, they’re all calling. I expect to be working in a dayjob again by the end of August. A stable paycheck and a consistent work schedule will make it a lot easier for me to pursue my writing and Dagan Books projects. It seems like a dayjob would mean I have less time, but in fact I think I’ll have more–freelance editing, which is a great skill that few have and I feel lucky to have it as a fallback, means spending hours and hours a week just looking for work, or doing sample edits (which is essentially applying for and interviewing for a job, with every single editing project I take on).
  • SFWA continues to move forward with its plan to reorganize the Bulletin; I got to proof the survey which is about to go out to members, and I can say it’s quite comprehensive.
  • “Editors of Gor” is still a thing I am writing. I have a couple of editing deadlines this week, but I’m hoping to get my Gor parody story finished this weekend. I am a woman of my word, after all, even if those words are, “Wait, what do you want me to write?”
  • My SF Signal column has been on a brief hiatus while I sort out what to write about. I’m locked into a very small segment of comics–SF/F/H independent comics only, and Top Shelf/Image/Dark Horse don’t count as indie for this purposes of this column. When I came to SF Signal, there was already another writer handling those titles, and sharing isn’t an option at this point. I can write more than I have been, if I want to write negative reviews of truly indie books I’ve read but didn’t like. That’s not the kind of reviewer I am. I want to share the titles you should be reading, not tearing down the ones I think you shouldn’t. So, a break… But not for too much longer, I hope. I’ve been writing there for 8 months and I’ve like to do at least a year before I decide whether to move on.

* I made pork/shrimp lumpia this week that were dryer than usual; realized that I’d used a leaner cut of pork, so there was hardly any fat. Yeah, that’s not going to work. But on the up side, there are vegetables in there, too! Well. Some shredded carrots and onion. Oh, and garlic! See, it’s healthy.

#SFWAPro

Short Fiction Workshop: Better Writing Through Brevity ($50, 4 week class, begins Aug 1)

Beginning August 1, 2013, I’ll be offering a 4-week short fiction workshop online. It’s geared toward people with schedules that might keep them from being able to take a similar workshop in person, as well as non-US writers who might be 12 hours ahead or behind the rest of the class*. I wanted to keep the cost small to accommodate the folks who’ve asked me to do something like this because they can’t currently afford to hire me as an editor. This class is only $50 per person, and includes a free edit of your final writing exercise.

Before the class starts, you’ll get access to a private, online forum. There you’ll find the recommended reading, broken down by story size, as well as a place to introduce yourself. You can post your writing exercises and ideas in this space without having to worry–because it’s not open to the public, your stories won’t be considered “previously published”. You can post any time of the day or night, and your work and comments will get seen by the rest of the class.

At the beginning of each week, you’ll be emailed the lecture and assignment for that week (you are not required to be online at any specific time). You do the writing exercise for that week, and once you’ve posted it, we’ll be able to discuss your work. I will personally critique every bit of writing that gets posted, as well as answer questions and participate in the conversations. Your final assignment, a flash piece of up to 1000 words, won’t be posted in the forum. Instead, you’ll email the story to me, and I will do a thorough edit of each one. The class schedule looks like this:

Microfiction

Week 1 (Thursday, August 1): Introduction, 140 characters, 150 words

Week 2 (August 8): More discussion, Long sentence/six sentence stories

Flash fiction

Week 3 (August 15): 500 word stories

Week 4 (August 22): 1000 words (discuss your ideas online, but email the story to me)

After the class: edits, further reading suggestions

The online forum looks like this:

click to see a larger version

click to see a larger version

By enrolling right away, you can get early access to the “Recommended Reading”. Within 24 hours of signing up, you’ll get an email with more information, and an invite to the forum.

Plus, I’m going to limit the class size, and if you wait to sign up you might miss out.

Sign up now! $50 per person

What qualifies me to teach this class?

I am currently putting together my fourth anthology of short fiction (as an editor). I am a short fiction writer, myself, and have sold every size of short fiction, from 140 character stories, through microfiction, flash, and short stories above 1000 words. You can find my flash pieces at Daily Science Fiction and Goldfish Grimm, as well as upcoming stories in Mad Scientist Journal and at Akashic Books. I also have 20 years of experience as an editor, as well as three years teaching writing to individual students. In addition, this process of working through microfiction up to flash and then beyond is exactly the path I took when I got serious about my fiction writing a few years ago. I talk about that in the introduction to my short fiction collection, Women and Other Constructs, out now.

* Everyone is welcome, but the class will be taught in English.

#SFWAPro