Home » Posts tagged 'don pizarro'
Tag Archives: don pizarro
Site Stats, 2012
By far the most popular post I wrote in 2012 was Fuck You, Weird Tales, followed by Readercon 2012 – the sexual harrasment edition, proving once again that you people like it when I get wordy with righteous indignation. (Good, because it’s bound to happen again.)
I had slightly more than 15,600 views at the site this year, averaging about 45 a day. That’s up from 9000 views in 2011. (WP is only recently measuring visitors vs views, but current data suggests about 3/4 of my views are unique visitors.)
Most of my readers are from the United States (about 2/3), followed mainly by Canada, the UK, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, and the Philippines, followed by less than 100 views each from dozens of other countries. I’m pleased to see that I have occasional readers in places like Fiji, Iraq, Nepal, Iceland, Vietnam, Ireland, Israel, and Japan.
Top referrers to my site (after a collection of search engines) are Twitter and Facebook, followed by SF Signal and Functional Nerds, as well as several fellow writers (NK Jemisin, Ken Liu, Matt Bennardo, Jim C. Hines, Matthew Cheney, and Don Pizarro). Which shows that being involved in social networking, writing guest posts, and promoting other writers pays off.
Speaking of search engines, the top search terms that drove people to the site were:
| Search | Views |
|---|---|
| carrie cuinn | 138 |
| “claude lalumiere” | 68 |
| writing about me | 30 |
| kanbanpad review | 24 |
| history of book cover design | 23 |
| what makes a thriller | 23 |
| kanbanpad | 20 |
| author blurb | 19 |
| readercon 2012 | 19 |
| cuinn | 17 |
| book spine poetry | 15 |
| dmz graphic novel | 13 |
| decolonialism | 11 |
| ken liu writer | 10 |
which suggests I should spend a little more time talking about book cover design and typography, and update my post about Kanbanpad.
Overall these stats tell me that the more I post, the more readers I have (which may translate to more readers of my fiction/essays, and more sales of my work). It also tells me most of the people who come to my website are actually looking for me, which is always nice to know. In the coming year I plan to keep up with the book reviews, post more original fiction, keep promoting writers I admire, and continue to talk about the process of writing/publishing/book creation. Don’t worry, though, there’ll be snark and some sarcasm and the occasional rant, too.
After all, I know what you really come here for.
I Like Men. There, I Said It.
Recently Don, who happens to be both a man and a writer, talked about how he needed to read more male writers. He’s a voracious reader and especially loves indie writers, and has introduced me to some of the women who now live in my “favorite writers” list. As he says:
Everyone who does know me as a writer, or has read this blog, knows of my love of M. Rickert, Aimee Bender, Carol Emshwiller, Karen Joy Fowler (her short work, at least), and Kelly Link. I’ve recently acquired and devoured collections by Joan Aiken and Margaret St. Clair. My favorite issue of Tin House thus far is 33: Fantastic Women. The only novel I’ve really, truly enjoyed in the past few years was Sarah Shun-lien Bynum’s Madeline is Sleeping. I wish I could write like Lydia Davis, Ann Beattie, and Amy Hempel. I also wish I had Fran Lebowitz’s brain. These writers have really sort of set the bar as far as what I look for in a story.
Sure, there are male writers who do that for me, too. Etgar Keret, Ray Vukcevich, Howard Waldrop, Peter S. Beagle, Harlan Ellison, Raymond Carver, Barry Hannah, and… um… and… and…
See, therein lies the problem.
Yes, that is a problem. I know how it used to be, when women didn’t get to be writers (especially not of genre fiction) unless they had a lot of male friends to stick up for them or submitted under a decidedly male pen name. It used to be that the only choices you had were male writers, and as we moved forward in time, the push to include female writers became almost a push back against the men. While you’d never find a convention panel on the mediocrity of female writers these days, panels on “Great Women Writers” abound. This is good, because it introduces lesser-know women to an audience that hadn’t read them before. That’s the point of the panel. Panels on the misogyny of male writers exist too. That’s not OK. (Edited to add: Neither is declining to let panelists speak because they’re “white males” and then following them around to harass them for being male, which I witnessed at this year’s Readercon.)
It’s just as sexist and wrong to label the entire male gender as “bad” as it was to label to entire female gender as “weak”. Yes, we needed to move past the point where men got the word counts and women got to be secretaries. BUT! It seems the drive to promote women in fiction has evolved into open season on men, as if a predominately male field of writers in the past means that men writing now must all be assholes.
Even Don, who loves women writers, and is having to force himself to read more men because his bookshelf is lacking in that department, has to carefully defend his choice lest he be labeled a woman-hater. This is what we’ve done, readers. We’ve allowed ourselves – as a community of writers and readers – to think that talking about women (in a positive way, of course) is right and good, but liking men leads to shady behavior. So here I am, a woman, and a writer, and a reader, proclaiming that when it comes to the authors I admire, I like Men. Not “the best”, not “only”, but there exists in my world a deep and abiding love for some very manly writers, and I’m not afraid to admit it.
Readercon 2011 Recap: Saturday / Sunday (and we’re done)
I’ve previously talked about the books I brought home from Readercon, some Readercon advice on writing an author blurb, and recapped Thursday/Friday.
Saturday morning was breakfast at Panera, then panels:
11 AM Book Design and Typography in the Digital Era Neil Clarke, Erin Kissane, Ken Liu, David G. Shaw (leader), Alicia Verlager. From this I found out that Ken knows quite a bit about the history of the book and its evolution from scroll to codex to ebook, making him officially one of my favorite people ever. This was one of the most informed panels I attended, and I felt that all of the panelists had useful things to add to the discussion. I only wished it were longer.
12:00 PM Daughters of the Female Man Matthew Cheney, Gwendolyn Clare, Elizabeth Hand (leader), Barbara Krasnoff, Chris Moriarty. I tend to avoid panels on women’s issues in fiction, honestly. I’m of the school that we should promote damn fine writers who happen to be women as opposed to promoting women writers and hoping they’re good. I come from an academic background and am particularly informed by the discussion about women’s place in art history, and the (absurd) question which always gets asked, “Why are there no good women artists?” However this panel was excellent both for it’s suggestions for further reader and for the way it didn’t focus on anything other than good writing by women. Notable for this panel was the absurd statement from the audience about how the panel should have done “a little more work” and created an annotated bibliography to hand out (you know, so we wouldn’t have to read anything on our own).